Detail príspevku/publikácie

The Contrast between Dogmatic and Critical Arguments

Organon F, 2015, roč. 22, č. 1, s. 9-20.
Jazyk: English
Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF*
BibTex EndNote Tagged EndNote XML RIS

Štatistika dokumentu:

Počet prístupov: 3,243
Počet prístupov dnes: 0
Naposledy zobrazené: 03.12.2024 - 17:50
Počet stiahnutí PDF: 1044

Abstrakt

Karl Popper lamented the prevalence of dogmatic argument in philosophy and commended the kind of critical argument that is found in the sciences. David Miller criticises the uncritical nature of so-called critical thinking because of its attachment to dogmatic arguments. I expound and clarify Popper’s distinction between critical and dogmatic arguments and the background to it. I criticise some errors in Miller’s discussion. I reaffirm the need for philosophers to eschew dogmatic arguments in favour of critical ones.

Kľúčové slová

Critical argument, critical thinking, David Miller, dogmatic argument, fallibilism, falsification, inference to the best explanation, justification, Karl Popper, persuasion, problem-solving

*Príspevok je chránený zákonom o autorskom práve a právach súvisiacich s autorským právom (autorský zákon).