<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Koreň, Ladislav</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quantificational Accounts of Logical Consequence II: In the Footsteps of Bolzano</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quantificational Accounts of Logical Consequence II: In the Footsteps of Bolzano</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interpretations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">logical consequence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">persistence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantificational accounts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">substitutions</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2014/3/303-326.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">303-326</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quantificational accounts of logical consequence account for it in terms of truth-preservation in all cases – be it admissible substitutional variants or interpretations with respect to non-logical terms. In this second of my three connected studies devoted to the quantificational tradition I set out to reconstruct the seminal contributions of Russell, Carnap, Tarski and Quine and evaluate them vis-à-vis some of the most pressing objections. This study also prepares the ground for my discussion of the standard model-theoretic account of consequence to be found in the concluding study.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">303326</style></custom3></record></records></xml>