<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bielik, Lukáš</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gahér, František</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Využitie pojmu zhoda v hyperintenzionálnej dedukcii</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Prospects of the Concept Match in Hyperintensional Deduction</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deduction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inference</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">match</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natural Deduction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sequent calculus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transparent intensional logic</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2013/2/98-111.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">98-111</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The paper deals with the usefulness of Pavel Tichý’s concept of &lt;i&gt;match&lt;/i&gt; between two (or more) constructions for the deduction and inference considerations. Tichý’s preference of the two-dimensional view on inference instead of the one-dimensional view is criticized. The reasons for the implementation of the &lt;i&gt;match&lt;/i&gt; concept are elucidated. The logical expressiveness of the &lt;i&gt;match&lt;/i&gt; concept is demonstrated through its implementation to the Natural Deduction System explicated in the hyperintensional framework of Transparent Intensional Logic.</style></abstract><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">98111</style></custom3><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></custom5></record></records></xml>