<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Baumann, Pierre</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Are Quantifier Phrases Always Quantificational? The Case of ‘Every F’</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Are Quantifier Phrases Always Quantificational? The Case of ‘Every F’</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Determiners</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Generalized Quantifier Theory</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gricean pragmatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantifiers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reference</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2013/2/143-172.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">143-172</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper argues that English quantifier phrases of the form ‘every F’ admit of a literal referential interpretation, contrary to the standard semantic account of this expression, according to which it denotes a set and a second-order relation. Various arguments are offered in favor of the referential interpretation, and two likely objections to it are forestalled.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">143172</style></custom3></record></records></xml>