@article {1212,
	title = {Synchronn{\'\i} a diachronn{\'\i} emergence},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {21},
	number = {1},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {57-69},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In the current discussions about emergent entities there is a new topic in the problem of diachronic and synchronic conception of emergence. The diachronic conception emphasizes the emergence of new phenomena over time, the synchronic conception coexistence of new "high-level" objects or properties of existing objects or properties on a lower level. There is a general belief that these two concepts are conceptually different and yet they cannot find a unifying framework that would allow unifying them in a more general sense. I believe and I try to show that both concepts diverge and it is possible to create a unifying framework for them.},
	keywords = {Diachronic, emergence, reduction, supervenience, synchronic},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2014/1/57-69.pdf},
	author = {Havl{\'\i}k, Vladim{\'\i}r}
}
