@article {1063,
	title = {External Realism as a Non-Epistemic Thesis},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {19},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {25-30},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In this paper I concentrate on evaluating Searle{\textquoteright}s concept of external realism as a non-epistemic thesis . Above all, I evaluate the role it plays in our system of beliefs, knowledge and communicative obligations. There are two important questions: (1) whether a return of transcendental philosophy creates a positive alternative to philosophical naturalism (Quine); (2) whether for the same purpose Fraassens{\textquoteright} constructive empiricism suffices. },
	keywords = {condition of intelligibility, constructive empiricism, external realism, naturalism, point-of-view invariance},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/2/25-30.pdf},
	author = {Z{\'a}me{\v c}n{\'\i}k, Luk{\'a}{\v s}}
}
