@article {1212, title = {Synchronn{\'\i} a diachronn{\'\i} emergence}, journal = {Organon F}, volume = {21}, number = {1}, year = {2014}, pages = {57-69}, type = {State}, abstract = {In the current discussions about emergent entities there is a new topic in the problem of diachronic and synchronic conception of emergence. The diachronic conception emphasizes the emergence of new phenomena over time, the synchronic conception coexistence of new "high-level" objects or properties of existing objects or properties on a lower level. There is a general belief that these two concepts are conceptually different and yet they cannot find a unifying framework that would allow unifying them in a more general sense. I believe and I try to show that both concepts diverge and it is possible to create a unifying framework for them.}, keywords = {Diachronic, emergence, reduction, supervenience, synchronic}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2014/1/57-69.pdf}, author = {Havl{\'\i}k, Vladim{\'\i}r} }