<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">García-Carpintero, Manuel</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Fictional Reference Rigid?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Fictional Reference Rigid?</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fiction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fictional reference</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reference</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rigid designators</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2015/1/145-168.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">145-168</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Are ordinary proper names &lt;i&gt;rigid&lt;/i&gt; when they occur in fictional discourse? In previous work (García-Carpintero 2010a) I have argued that they are not, at least when we consider the core case of &lt;i&gt;textual&lt;/i&gt; fictional discourse, and also the case, dependent on it, of &lt;i&gt;paratextual&lt;/i&gt; fictional discourse. From a perspective on such discourse which—on my reading of Koťátko (2004) and (2013)—I understand to be not far away from mine, Petr Koťátko (2010) argues that they are not: “proper names remain &lt;i&gt;rigid designators&lt;/i&gt; in Kripke’s sense ... even if transferred from ‘everyday’ communication to literary texts” (&lt;i&gt;op. cit.&lt;/i&gt;, 94). After explaining how I understand the relevant concepts in the first section, I’ll critically take up Petr’s arguments in the second.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">145168</style></custom3><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></custom5></record></records></xml>