<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zouhar, Marián</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dva druhy neartikulovaných zložiek</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Two Kinds of Unarticulated Constituents</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">expansion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">explicitly unarticulated constituent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">free enrichment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">implicitly unarticulated constituent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">literal meaning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">proposition 	expressed</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">propositional unity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/1/291-307.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">291-307</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">It is often claimed that propositions expressed by certain kinds of sentence involve constituents that are unarticulated at the linguistic level. Two sorts of unarticulated constituents are sometimes distinguished in the literature – those that are explicitly unarticulated and those that are implicitly unarticulated. The main claim of the present paper is that, contrary to appearances, there are no implicitly unarticulated constituents and that all of them are in fact explicitly unarticulated ones. The argument runs as follows: If a propositional constituent is supposed to be implicitly unarticulated, it appears in the proposition on the basis of free enrichment (or expansion). On the other hand, if a propositional constituent is explicitly unarticulated, it appears in the proposition on the basis of another kind of process, namely saturation (or completion). However, it is shown that free enrichment (and expansion) leads to a serious problem concerning the unity of propositions. Consequently, if this problem is to be circumvented, free enrichment (and expansion) has to be rejected. As a result, implicitly unarticulated constituents have to be rejected as well.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papers</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">291307</style></custom3><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></custom5></record></records></xml>