@article {blum_a2007:1481,
	title = {A Note on Theological Fatalism},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {14},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {143-147},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {We contend that a very seductive argument for theological fatalism fails. In the course of our discussion we point out that theological fatalism is incompatible with the existence of a being who is omnipotent, omniscient and infallible. We suggest that {\textquoteleft}possible{\textquoteright} formalized as {\textquoteleft}\&loz;{\textquoteright} is to be understood as {\textquoteleft}can or could have been{\textquoteright} and not simply as {\textquoteleft}can{\textquoteright}. The argument we discuss conflates the two. We end by rounding out, hope-fully, some left over corners of serious concern to the theist.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2007/2/143-147.pdf},
	author = {Blum, Alex}
}
