Detail príspevku/publikácie

The Food Thief: Alleviation of Responsibility in Terms of All-Things-Considered Obligations

Filozofia, 2019, roč. 74, č. 10, s. 841-851.
Jazyk: English
Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF*
BibTex EndNote Tagged EndNote XML RIS

Štatistika dokumentu:

Počet prístupov: 187
Počet prístupov dnes: 2
Naposledy zobrazené: 25.02.2020 - 02:03

Abstrakt

People sometimes have to steal food to survive. Yet it is unclear whether they are to be excused for doing so. A recent paper by Alejandra Mancilla argues for the rarely defended affirmative answer. About the same time, the Italyʼs Supreme Court of Cassation ruled that stealing a small amount of food when in extreme need does not constitute a crime. Given that food thieves in extreme need can be sometimes excused, the present paper aims to offer a semi-formal account of responsibility that makes space for the alleviation of responsibility in such ‘food thief’ scenario. I argue that a solution is buried in the notion of eligible strategy employed in an account of responsibility suggested by Matthew Braham and Martin van Hees. I argue that a possible answer to the issue of (in)eligibility can be provided in terms of all-things-considered obligations, or the lack thereof.

Kľúčové slová

All-things-considered, Eligibility, Responsibility, State of necessity