%0 Journal Article
%J Filozofia
%D 2020
%T Proč chápat Popperův kritický dualismus deciosionisticky
%A Buráň, Ján
%K Critical dualism
%K Is-ought
%K Karl Popper
%K Moral objectivism
%K Moral relativism
%K Open society
%X There is not much in The Open Society to suggest that Karl Popper was a moral objectivist. Yet, that is exactly what he himself claimed later in life. Was the widespread “decisionistic” reading of The Open Society just a grand misunderstanding, or did Popper change his metaethical views without acknowledging it? I give reasons as to why we should hold the latter to be true. I also argue that even were the former the case, decisionism would still be more compatible with the open society ideal.
%B Filozofia
%V 75
%P 474 - 489
%G eng
%U https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/06241548filozofia.2020.75.6.4.pdf
%9 State
%2 Articles
%3 474489