@article {palovicova_z2003:581,
	title = {Etika cnosti a etika pravidiel. Komplementarita, {\v c}i alternat{\'\i}vy?},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {58},
	number = {6},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {396-408},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In the last decades the ethics of virtue became the central issue of ethical research. This leads to the question, whether the ethics of virtue is an alternative or a complementary theory to the deontological ethics. The question then is, whether the ethics of virtue can be fully independent of moral rules and which of the issues of the ethics of virtue can not, due to their specific character, be resolved in the frame of deontological ethics. The attention is paid to the vigorous aspects as well as to the blind spots of this theory. The deontological approaches and the approaches based on virtue are seen by the author as two different, limited, partially overlapping, but mutually independent ethical perspectives. For her the discussions about whether these ethical systems are alternative or complementary are the discussions concerning the grounds of ethics.},
	author = {Palovi{\v c}ov{\'a}, Zuzana}
}
