@article {liptak_m2011:2419, title = {Ran{\'y} Merleau-Ponty v diskusii s naturalizmom a psychol{\'o}giou}, journal = {Filozofia}, volume = {66}, number = {9}, year = {2011}, pages = {935-943}, type = {V{\'y}ro{\v c}ia}, abstract = {The aim of the paper is an examination of the critical passages in Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s La structure du comportement to show the fruitfulness of Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s critical examination of scientific interpretations of behavior and of several case-studies. Further, attention is paid to criticism of Gestaltpsychology and transcendentalism. In the end the author tries to show, how useful Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s {\textquotedblleft}inductive{\textquotedblright} approach and his way of argumentation used in the book could be for reading of his later works, as well as for phenomenological enquiries in general.}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2011/9/935-943.pdf}, author = {Michal Lipt{\'a}k} }