@article {13268,
	title = {McDowell and Brandom on Observational Knowledge},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {76},
	number = {6},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {423 {\textendash} 435},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell{\textquoteright}s critique of Robert Brandom{\textquoteright}s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom{\textquoteright}s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell{\textquoteright}s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique.},
	keywords = {Empirical content, inference, justification, Observational knowledge, Reliability},
	url = {https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/070111522021.76.6.3.pdf},
	author = {{\v C}ukljevi{\'c}, Filip}
}
