@article {12407,
	title = {Jak vznik{\'a} n{\v e}co nov{\'e}ho? Zalo{\v z}en{\'\i} a transcendence},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {72},
	number = {4},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {259-270},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper shows different approaches to creativity, i.e. emergence of new meanings, in Merleau-Ponty and Pato{\v c}ka. The comparison is based mainly on Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s lectures and Pato{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s project <em>Negative Platonism</em> (1953). Despite some similarities evident in the key concepts {\textquotedblleft}institution{\textquotedblright} and "transcendence", there is a decisive difference between the two approaches concerning the temporality of creation. Whereas Merleau-Ponty likens the temporality of institution to future perfect tense, emphasizing the intertwining of present and future events, Pato{\v c}ka understands novelty as something totally different from present state of affairs. In his eyes, the question of how something new can arise equals the question of how attitude of distance to existing traditions can be achieved. Contrary to Pato{\v c}ka, Merleau-Ponty argues that any living tradition tends towards its own transformation and presents a case of self-transcendence, because it is governed by the principle of divergence ({\'e}cart). Finally, we argue that some aspects of these two approaches both complement each other, and also show the limits of each other.},
	keywords = {Bergson, Creativity, Emergence, Expressivity, Husserl, Institution, Merleau-Ponty, Novelty, Pato{\v c}ka, Phenomenology, Temporality, Transcendence},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2017/4/259-270.pdf},
	author = {Puc, Jan}
}
