@article {12328,
	title = {Je rozli{\v s}ovanie dvoch druhov {\quotedblbase}kres{\v t}anskej filozofie{\textquotedblleft} zmyslupln{\'e}?},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {72},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {162-172},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper deals with an attractive distinction between two kinds of Christian phi- losophy according to Winfried L{\"o}ffler, who claims that: i) there are two basic (irreducible to each other) kinds of Christian philosophy, namely Augustinian and Thomistic; ii) Thomistic is more preferable, because it is immune to questionable blending philosophy and theology. The core of the study is the critique of L{\"o}ffler{\textquoteright}s argumentation: First, it disputes plausibility of the sharp distinction between the two kinds of Christian philosophy. Second, it criticizes the idea of neutral premises in philosophy. Third, it attacks the theory of {\textquotedblleft}patching up the gaps{\textquotedblright} in our knowledge with theological premises.},
	keywords = {Christian philosophy, Rational/religious knowledge, Thomistic/Augustinian approach, W. L{\"o}ffler, Worldview reasoning},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2017/3/162-172.pdf},
	author = {Hrk{\'u}t, J{\'a}n}
}
