@article {12225,
	title = {Kant a antropol{\'o}gia ako vademecum svetoob{\v c}ana},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {6},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {514-524},
	type = {Rozh{\v l}ady},
	abstract = {Kant{\textquoteright}s way of developing anthropology differs from that characteristic of the scientific spirit of the 18th century. Besides omitting the natural determination of humans he composes anthropology as a doctrine with practical intentions. He defines pragmatic anthropology as a reflected self-formation, whose objective is not a theory of a human being ({\textquotedblleft}school anthropology{\textquotedblright} in Kant{\textquoteright}s terminology), but rather a set of practical instructions for approaching oneself as well as the others. Thus, drawing to some extent on Michel Foucault, Kant{\textquoteright}s anthropology can be understood as a modern conception of the art of living. Kant{\textquoteright}s <em>Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view</em> is not just a purposeless summary of his numerous lectures on anthropology; it is rather a sort of vade-mecum or a prescriptive writing focused on purposeful practice.},
	keywords = {Cosmopolitan, Kant, Philosophy of history, Pragmatic anthropology, Problematizations of life},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2016/6/514-524.pdf},
	author = {Martin {\v C}engeri}
}
