@article {12219,
	title = {Estetika existencie: umenie, {\v c}i {\'e}tos individu{\'a}lneho {\v z}ivota?},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {6},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {437-449},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The article draws on the conclusions of the discussion which on one hand showed the reception of Foucault{\textquoteright}s {\textquotedblleft}aesthetics of existence{\textquotedblright} and on the other hand offered a partial reflection on the {\textquotedblleft}topicality of the aesthetic{\textquotedblright} in postmodern philosophy. The issue in question is understood as related to the process of aestheticization from modernity to contemporary self-controlled society. The focus is on questions such as {\quotedblbase}What does the tendency to give one{\textquoteright}s own existence a mark of {\textquotedblleft}visible beauty{\textquotedblright} mean? How does the aesthetic promote itself in non-aesthetic (especially ethical) spheres of life? Attention is paid first of all to how the aesthetics of existence and the requirements of a higher standard individual ethics are interconnected. The conceptions of M. Foucault, J. Fr{\"u}chtl and W. Schmid are referred to as the main sources of consideration.},
	keywords = {Aestheticization, Aesthetics of existence, Ethos, M. Foucault, Philosophy of the art of living, W. Schmid},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2016/6/437-449.pdf},
	author = {Sis{\'a}kov{\'a}, O{\v l}ga}
}
