@article {12148,
	title = {Filozofia dej{\'\i}n bez historickej nevyhnutnosti (?)},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {3},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {186-196},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In his article the author justifies a critical attitude towards both the Enlightenment concept of progress and the European philosophy of history based on teleology. Adorno{\textquoteright}s negative dialectics provides an inspiration in getting rid of the monster of historical necessity in philosophy of history. Adorno{\textquoteright}s attitude is overtime due to his using the concept of dominance to anticipate the need to rethink the relation between civilization (culture) and nature. Instead of growth fetishism a new economic paradigm of degrowth is postulated, performed by N. Georgescu-Roegen. The vision of a new civilization is embodied in the vision of a society of sustainable degrowth. This new civilization is able to sustain homeostasis-like negentropia in the form of a feedback through culture.},
	keywords = {Aufheben, Degrowth, Historical necessity, Negative dialectics, Progress, Silent transformation, Super-Civilization, The cunning of reason},
	author = {Hoho{\v s}, Ladislav}
}
