@article {12099,
	title = {Meta-reprezentace. Michel Foucault a s{\'e}mantick{\'e} n{\'a}sil{\'\i} strukturalismu},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {1},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {14-24},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The article tries to answer the question: Why the publication of <em>The Order of Things</em> aroused the polemics about M. Foucault{\textquoteright}s being a structuralist? Unlike structuralism, Foucault{\textquoteright}s archeology introduces semantic structures into history: he examines the dramatic rearrangement of words and things in history to unveil the historical background of the production of the period-related, transitory, discontinued, relative knowledge. In the author{\textquoteright}s view, this method is contradictory in itself as it does not consider its own politics of meaning: While describing the three ways of the epistemic generating of representations Foucault nevertheless ascribes the arbitrary representation of things by words to the only {\'e}pist{\'e}m{\'e}, namely the {\quotedblbase}classical{\textquotedblleft} one. It is the later Foucault who reflects on the ethics of meaning, which unveils the production of representation in every politics of meaning, even in its own one, creating thus the meta-representations.},
	keywords = {Jacques Derrida, Meta-Representation, Michel Foucault, Parrhesia, Poststructuralism, Representation, Rhetorics, Structuralism},
	author = {Fi{\v s}erov{\'a}, Michaela}
}
