@article {12058,
	title = {Funkcie fik{\v c}n{\'e}ho narat{\'\i}vu a konanie {\v c}itate{\v l}a},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {70},
	number = {8},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {670-679},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The study deals with the reference of fictional narrative and the theoretical conceptualization of the reader{\textquoteright}s activity. It is a response to a study by the philosopher Petr Ko{\v t}{\'a}tko, in which he argues that a narrative fictional text (as well as any other text) directs our thinking and imagination at a real world. Thereby Petr Ko{\v t}{\'a}tko disputes the theory of ontologically independent fictional worlds. The result of the comparison of both approaches is the author{\textquoteright}s belief, that there is a tension between Petr Ko{\v t}{\'a}tko{\textquoteright}s attempt to simplify the fictional reference and the substantial feature of the fictional narrative reader{\textquoteright}s activity. The reader has to act in two ways (like in a game): on one hand he believes, that what he reads really happens, on the other hand he understands, that what he reads is a fiction. Constant relating text and reality to each other using the operator {\textquotedblleft}as if{\textquotedblleft} (Petr Ko{\v t}{\'a}tko) rather disturbs the game-like character of the activity (especially when reading non-mimetic texts). On the contrary the theory of fictional worlds (Marie-Laure Ryan, Lubom{\'\i}r Dole{\v z}el) takes into account two levels of the reader{\textquoteright}s activity.},
	keywords = {fictional worlds, literary functions, Reference of fictional narrative, Theory of fictional worlds},
	author = {Jan{\v c}ovi{\v c}, Ivan}
}
