@article {12019,
	title = {Pato{\v c}kova p{\'e}{\v c}e o du{\v s}i mezi S{\'o}kratem, Plat{\'o}nem a Aristotelem},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {70},
	number = {6},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {409-419},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper investigates the structure of Pao{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s interpretation of {\quotedblbase}the care of the soul{\textquotedblleft}. From Pato{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s analyses as well as from the commentary works it is obvious, that Pato{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s eminent interest was to render the soul as open, unconceivable, problematic and as such forcing a person to live in a positive uncertainty, i.e. in a moral condition which makes her responsible for her own deeds. In ancient tradition this stand seems to have been adopted by Socrates whom Pato{\v c}ka on this very ground prefers to Plato, who on the contrary made the care of the soul a part of his metaphysical theory of ideas. Some Pato{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s accounts suggest, however, that this Socratic conception did not comfort the later Pato{\v c}ka either. Thus the conception which he personally appreciated at most goes back to Aristotle who was the first to introduce the concept of <em>action</em>. As far as I know, in secondary sources this point is not taken into account sufficiently, although it substantially changes the pattern of Pato{\v c}ka{\textquoteright}s care of the soul and makes new interpretations of his conception possible.},
	keywords = {Aristotle, Care of the Soul, Pato{\v c}ka, Plato, Socrates},
	author = {Blecha, Ivan}
}
