@article {vicenik_j1997:257,
	title = {T. S. Kuhn a te{\'o}ria vedeck{\'y}ch revol{\'u}ci{\'\i}},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {4},
	number = {4},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {337-358},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In his paper the author focuses on the analysis of 1. Kuhn{\textquoteright}s self-reflection, his discovery of hermeneutics and its importance for the new way of reading (interpretation) and understanding the text, 2. Kuhn{\textquoteright}s comprehension of the relation between history and philosophy of science and of many different factors which influence upon forming and development of a modern history of science, 3. Working out of Kuhn{\textquoteright}s specific conceptional apparatus (paradigm, normal science, anomaly, crisis, scientific revolution, and so on), 4. Kuhn{\textquoteright}s cycle of scientific knowledge (his conception of scientific paradigms alternation) and 5. some methodological controversions concerning incomensurability of scientific paradigms, understandig of the normal science and Kuhn{\textquoteright}s antirealism.},
	author = {Vicen{\'\i}k, Jozef}
}
