<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michal Lipták</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raný Merleau-Ponty v diskusii s naturalizmom a psychológiou</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Early Merleau-Ponty in a Dialogue with Naturalism and Psychology</style></translated-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2011/9/935-943.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">66</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">935-943</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The aim of the paper is an examination of the critical passages in Merleau-Ponty’s La structure du comportement to show the fruitfulness of Merleau-Ponty’s critical examination of scientific interpretations of behavior and of several case-studies. Further, attention is paid to criticism of Gestaltpsychology and transcendentalism. In the end the author tries to show, how useful Merleau-Ponty’s “inductive” approach and his way of argumentation used in the book could be for reading of his later works, as well as for phenomenological enquiries in general.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Výročia</style></work-type></record></records></xml>