<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sebastián Contreras Aguirre</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Was Hugo Grotius a Rationalist?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Was Hugo Grotius a Rationalist?</style></translated-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">78</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">619 - 633</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scholars situate Grotius at the origin of &lt;em&gt;more geometrico&lt;/em&gt; rationalism. According to this reading, he is responsible for the transition from a dialectical to a deductivist interpretation of the naturally just. Grotius, however, neither deems ethics explainable through mathematics, nor does he think that reason alone determines whether an action is right or wrong. Without nature, he maintains, reason is an empty measure.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom6><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original Articles</style></custom6><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">619</style></section></record></records></xml>