<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foltin, Martin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Morálno-normatívne zdôvodnenie ľudských práv</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moral-normative Justification of Human Rights</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human nature</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human needs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human rights</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rationale for human rights</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/01261501filozofia.2021.76.1.4.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">46 – 58</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper presents and analyzes the moral-normative sources of human rights. In this article, we analyze the philosophical sources of human rights that relate to the question of why human beings should be holders of human rights, regardless of whether specific legal claims can be derived from them at the legal level. The paper addresses three main normative sources of human rights: (a) secular claims of human dignity; (b) claims based on human needs and human nature; and (c) transcendental claims. The article points out the limitations of these philosophical resources and suggests why it may be suitable to accept human rights based on a pluralistic notion of human nature.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4658</style></custom3></record></records></xml>