<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taliga, Miloš</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Argumentáciou sa zdôvodnenie nedá objaviť ani vytvoriť</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Justification Can Be Neither Discovered nor Created  by Argumentation</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Argumentation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cogent arguments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">epistemic justification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fallacy of begging the question</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regress problem</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2018/8/636-646.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">636-646</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Can argumentation discover that statements are justified? Or can justification of statements originate in argumentation? In the paper it is argued that as far as epistemic justification is concerned, both questions have to be answered in the negative. Because of the regress problem, argumentation cannot reveal justification. And because of the fallacy of begging the question, argumentation cannot produce justification. Consequently, it is utterly wrong to claim that the purpose of argumentation is to justify statements that are being argued for.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">636646</style></custom3></record></records></xml>