@article {12713,
	title = {{\quotedblbase}Fenomenologie nikdy nebyla{\textquotedblleft}. Heideggerova kritika fenomenologie v r{\'a}mci sebekritick{\'y}ch Pr{\r u}b{\v e}{\v z}n{\'y}ch pozn{\'a}mek ke spisu {\quotedblbase}Byt{\'\i} a {\v c}as{\textquotedblleft}},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {73},
	number = {10},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {844-853},
	type = {Diskusie - polemiky},
	abstract = {In 1936 Heidegger started to write down his continuous remarks to his book <em>Being and Time</em>. At the very beginning he discussed the methodology of his research and the character of phenomenology in general. Typically, he claimed that there never had been such a thing as phenomenology, for it was just a combination of Neo-Kantianism and psychologism. For Heidegger on the other hand, phenomenology represented a dynamism of thinking and a way of sharpening of philosophical insight. But even such a conception of phenomenology is incapable to access and explicate the question of being as appropriate to itself. Therefore Heidegger abandons phenomenology, and {\textquotedblleft}ontology{\textquotedblright} in favour of the so called {\textquotedblleft}history of being{\textquotedblright}.},
	keywords = {Heidegger, History of being, Neo-Kantianism, Phenomenology, Psychologism Being and Time},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2018/10/844-853.pdf},
	author = {Nov{\'a}k, Ale{\v s}}
}
