@article {12546,
	title = {On Context Shifters and Compositionality in Natural Languages},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {25},
	number = {1},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {2-20},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {My modest aim in this paper is to prove certain relations between some type of hyper-intensional operators, namely context shifting operators, and compositionality in natural languages. Various authors (e.g. von Fintel \& Matthewson 2008; Stalnaker 2014) have argued that context-shifting operators are incompatible with compositionality. In fact, some of them understand Kaplan{\textquoteright}s (1989) famous ban on context-shifting operators as a constraint on compositionality. Others, (e.g. Rabern 2013) take contextshifting operators to be compatible with compositionality but, unfortunately, do not provide a proof, or an argument in favor of their position. The aim of this paper is to do precisely that. Additionally, I provide a new proof that compositionality for propositional content (intension) is a proper generalization of compositionality for character (hyper-intensions).},
	keywords = {compositionality, context-shifting operators, indexicals, natural language semantics},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2018/1/2-20.pdf},
	author = {Briciu, Adrian}
}
