@article {muransky_m2008:1729,
	title = {Existuje absol{\'u}tna povinnos{\v t} vo{\v c}i etike? II. {\v c}as{\v t} (Probl{\'e}m etiky a sebach{\'a}pania v existencialistickej trad{\'\i}cii)},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {63},
	number = {9},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {750-762},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In the second part of his study the author analyzes Kierkegaard{\textasciiacute}s thesis of the suspension of ethics on three levels: firstly, in its relation to Kant, who insists on the universal self-understanding of every individual; secondly, in its relation to the post-metaphysical interpretation of Kant, in which ethics is a matter of inter-subjective relations; and thirdly, in its relation to the existential tradition represented by Ernst Tugendhat{\textasciiacute}s thesis concerning the need to differentiate between the existential and ethical self-understandings. The key role the {\quotedblbase}accidental{\textquotedblleft} plays in human action creates a non-universalistic way of self-understanding in which individuality definitely predominates universality.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2008/9/750-762.pdf},
	author = {Martin Mur{\'a}nsky}
}
