@article {13251,
	title = {Eco a Vattimo {\textendash} negat{\'\i}vny realizmus verzus slab{\'e} myslenie},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {76},
	number = {4},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {293 {\textendash} 306},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper intends to introduce main points of Eco{\textquoteright}s critique of Vattimo{\textquoteright}s philosophy. It focuses on differences in their approaches and provides a closer view of one of the philosophical discussions happening at the wake of the new mil-lennium. We focus on understanding reality and the limits of interpretation as the two key points of Eco{\textquoteright}s consideration and criticism. In 1983, Umberto Eco participated in publishing the well-known volume {\textquotedblleft}weak thought{\textquotedblright}, although he later no longer considered himself part of the philosophical initiative. He represents a position of minimal or negative realism. Gianni Vattimo is a proponent of the {\textquotedblleft}weak thought{\textquotedblright}, where reality is not introduced as stable, natural or objective. Reality does not itself speak out but needs a spokesmen or motivated interpreters. Vattimo, therefore revives Nietzsche{\textquoteright}s thought {\textquotedblleft}There are no facts, only interpretations{\textquotedblright}, which he deploys further in his own way.},
	keywords = {Gianni Vattimo, Interpretation, realism, Umberto Eco, Weak Thought},
	url = {https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/04301540filozofia.2021.76.4.5.pdf},
	author = {Va{\v s}ek, Martin}
}
