@article {12443,
	title = {Dekonstrukce {\quotedblbase}nen{\'\i}{\textquotedblleft} kritika},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {72},
	number = {7},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {515-526},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper focuses on Derrida{\textquoteright}s claim that {\textquotedblleft}margins{\textquotedblright} of philosophy are made of aporias, which bring no solution to the problems that can be positively solved in the center of Western metaphysics. According to the paper{\textquoteright}s hypothesis, Derrida{\textquoteright}s work is characterized by a circular movement of <em>subversive translation</em> of idioms into aporias, operating as a gest of resistance which immediately turns back to resignation. In fact, Derrida{\textquoteright}s aporia is no logical antinomy, it{\textquoteright}s rather an ethical experience of decision without end. This ethics of mistrust inspires Derrida, just like Kafka, to describe the pre-ontological aporias, the logically paralytic places, where it{\textquoteright}s impossible to formulate a problem and to propose its solution, let alone to do its critique. For these reasons - and contrary to what is often declared - deconstruction is no critique.},
	keywords = {Aporia, Critique, Deconstruction, Franz Kafka, Jacques Derrida, Law},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2017/7/515-526.pdf},
	author = {Fi{\v s}erov{\'a}, Michaela}
}
