@article {12321,
	title = {Achilles - S{\'o}kratov vzor? (Apol. 28b3-d6)},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {72},
	number = {2},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {103-113},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {After disproving Meletus, Socrates begins the next part of his defense in the court by explaining his activities. He explains to a hypothetical opponent what he considers to be really shameful (αἰσχρόν). To illustrate his speech, he uses the analogy of demi- gods who fell in the Trojan war. He focuses on the son of the goddess Thetis, i.e. Achilles, the most famous fighter in Homer{\textquoteright}s <em>Iliad</em>. According to Socrates{\textquoteright} interpretation Achilles preferred to avenge the death of his friend Patroclus rather than undergo something shameful (αἰσχρόν) although he knew that he would die. Did Pla- to{\textquoteright}s Socrates aim to arouse anger or outrage of his judges by being like Thetis{\textquoteright} son willing to die for a rightful cause? What was the real purpose of his comparison with Achilles? The aim of this paper is to examine the reason why Socrates drew a parallel between his own and Achilles{\textquoteright} pursuance.},
	keywords = {Achilles, Apology, Role model, Socrates},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2017/2/103-113.pdf},
	author = {Wollner, Ulrich}
}
