@article {12147,
	title = {K recepci Adornovy metody v aktu{\'a}ln{\'\i}ch podob{\'a}ch kritick{\'e} teorie},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {3},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {173-185},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The essay deals with the reception of Adorno{\textquoteright}s method in critical theory{\textquoteright}s contemporary forms. Firstly, it explores the Marxist methodological root of Adorno{\textquoteright}s theorizing in the concept of exchange (Adorno has slightly modified Marx{\textquoteright}s argumentation in <em>Capital</em> by focusing on the exchange process rather than on the value-form). Secondly, the essay criticizes Habermas{\textquoteright} and Honneth{\textquoteright}s interpretations of Adorno{\textquoteright}s approach: both of them are unable to explicate Adorno{\textquoteright}s dialectical materialism. That is why in Habermas and Honneth the critical theory collapses into a form of transcendental thought. Thirdly, against Habermas and Honneth, the essay argues that Sohn-Rethel{\textquoteright}s critical Marxist proposal to reconstruct critical theory as a dialectical exposition (<em>Darstellung</em>) of capitalism {\textendash} the historically determinate society premised upon the totality of {\quotesinglbase}real abstractions{\textquoteleft} {\textendash} provides much better initiation to Adorno{\textquoteright}s method.},
	keywords = {Adorno, Critical theory, Marxism, Method, Monetary exchange, Real abstraction},
	author = {Nov{\'y}, Martin}
}
