@article {12089, title = {Interpret{\'a}cia v pr{\'a}ve II}, journal = {Filozofia}, volume = {70}, number = {10}, year = {2015}, pages = {789-799}, type = {State}, abstract = {The article is a continuation of the author{\textquoteright}s contribution Interpretation in Law I (Filozofia 2015/8) with special attention paid to methods of interpretation in law: textualist, intentionalist, and teleological ones. It explains the cooperation of the law{\textquoteright}s purpose and the method of idealizing generalization in defining the propositions relevant for teleological arguments. Included are particular, so called {\textquotedblleft}logical methods{\textquotedblright} of interpreting law: the method a contrary, the method per analogies, as well as two kinds of the a fortiori argument (argument with even stronger reason): a minori ad maius and a maiori ad minus.}, keywords = {A fortiori, Abductive rule, Analogy, Argument, idealization, Interpretation, Law, Propositions of relevance, Teleological methods}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2015/10/789-799.pdf}, author = {Franti{\v s}ek Gah{\'e}r} }