@article {11694, title = {O jedné bouři v čajovém hrnku: Ch. S. Peirce, U. Eco a sémiotická metafyzika objektů}, journal = {Filozofia}, volume = {69}, number = {1}, year = {2014}, pages = {63-76}, type = {State}, abstract = {The paper deals with the problem of Eco{\textquoteright}s (mis)interpretation of some Peirceian themes, mainly in Eco{\textquoteright}s two texts: Theory of Semiotics and Kant and the Platypus. The author{\textquoteright}s focus is on the problems of the so called Dynamical object as a part of semiosis and of Peirce{\textquoteright}s realism. Resulting from the analysis is the main thesis of the article: We cannot conceive of Peirce as using {\quotedblbase}structuralist dictionary{\textquotedblleft} (as Eco did in his Theory of Semiotics).}, keywords = {Dynamical object, Eco, Peirce, Saussure, Semeiotic, Semiology, Semiosis, Semiotics}, author = {Martin {\v S}vantner} }