@article {11667,
	title = {Impossibilists{\textquoteright} Paradise on the Cheap?},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {20},
	number = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013},
	pages = {283-301},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The aim of the paper is to discuss the ersatz theory of Lewis{\textquoteright}s impossible worlds, point out its undeniable benefits and demonstrate its costs. Firstly, I present two approaches to Lewis{\textquoteright}s impossible worlds taken as constructions out of possibilia. Secondly, I evaluate the proposals using the Lewisian criteria of success concerning the well defined conception of analysis. Although appealing, I do not find the proposals fully persuasive. Thirdly, I discuss the objection from an ad hoc distinction between possible and impossible worlds. I conclude that the objection does not present a special problem for the Lewisian theory. Finally, I motivate a theory of extended modal realism, to wit, modal realism enriched with concrete impossibilia.},
	keywords = {David Lewis, impossible worlds., modal realism},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2013/3/283-301.pdf},
	author = {Vacek, Martin}
}
