@article {cernik_v1998:216,
	title = {Kantova kritika praktick{\'e}ho rozumu a praktick{\'e}ho usudzovania},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {5},
	number = {3},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {229-249},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper is a critical analysis of Kant{\textasciiacute}s concept of practical reasoning. It is based upon an analysis of Kant{\textasciiacute}s understanding of a man as a sensual-oversensual human being. The author focuses in an analysis of lawmaking of a practical reason. He concerns in Kant{\textasciiacute}s differentiation of cathegorical and hypothetivcal imperatives, or pure (autonomic) and ordinary will, respectively. Based on this analysis he consequently reconstructs Kant{\'s} understanding of a practical reasoning. He characterizes its basic types based on a technical imperative and pragmatic advice, on cathegorical and hypothetical imperative.},
	author = {V{\'a}clav {\v C}ern{\'\i}k}
}
