<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Turčan, Martin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kritika pojmu ľudskej dôstojnosti v koncepcii Suzy Killmisterovej</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critique of the Concept of Human Dignity in the Conception of Suzy Killmister</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human rights</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Personal dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Status dignity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/012416233_Turčan_stať_RZA_defi.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">77</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36 - 47</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The paper deals with Suzy Killmister’s approach to the concept of human dignity. The author analyzes her view and argues that the concept offered by her is relativistic to the degree in which the idea of universal human rights is susceptible to collapse, even though she seems to wish to uphold it. The author points to several problems in Killmister’s theory and concludes that, besides its inspiring nature, there is not a safe enough ground for its endorsement.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3647</style></custom3></record></records></xml>