<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Makovník, Dalibor</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nekauzálna explanácia: Hempelovo dedičstvo a jeho moderné podoby</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Non-causal Explanation: Hempel’s Legacy and its Modern Versions</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">D-N model of explanation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empirical regularity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Explanatory rele-vance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Non-causal explanation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scientific law</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temporal changes in a physical system</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/121911072_Makovn%C3%ADk_stať_RZA_defi.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">752 - 765</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper not only summarizes Hempel`s analysis of the D-N model that shows how it is possible for the covering-law model to provide both a causal account of particular facts and a non-casual one, but also offers four prominent examples of non-causal explanation. Subsequently a detailed analysis of the examples shows that there is a common denominator between these examples: the presence of a law that describes an empirical system in its atemporal state. But the paper also shows what differences there are in the applicability of the laws in the given explanations. Finally, it reviews the evolution of the conception of non-causal explanation with respect to the discussed examples.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">752765</style></custom3></record></records></xml>