<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bielik, Lukáš</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abdukcia a jej miesto vo vede a filozofii</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abduction and its Place in Science and Philosophy</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abduction in philosophy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abduction in science</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contexts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Differences</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Explanation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hypotheses</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/070111172021.76.6.1.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">391 – 406</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The paper analyzes four different aspects of abduction when used in science and philosophy. As a preliminary step, it presents the main kinds of abductive arguments in terms of their logical form and extralogical criteria of evaluation. Subsequently, it discusses the standard functions of abductive inference. Finally, it pays attention to four levels of difference in comparing the use of abduction in science with that in philosophy. In particular, it is argued that the difference between abduction in science and philosophy involves the distinct kinds of hypo- theses, a different notion of explanation, a difference in the contexts of abductive reasoning, and different criteria for the hypothesis-selection.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">391406</style></custom3></record></records></xml>