<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Labuda, Pavol</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Je pojmový relativizmus predpokladom filozofie ako pojmového inžinierstva?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Conceptual Relativism a Prerequisite for Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering?</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">antirealism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Concepts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conceptual engineering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conceptual schemes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">language</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Meaning change</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philosophy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">relativism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/01261451filozofia.2021.76.1.1.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3 – 17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The aim of the paper is to examine whether conceptual relativism is a prerequisite for conceptual engineering (and if so, then to what extent). In the first part of the paper, I explore and classify varieties of relativism to prepare a distinctive definition of conceptual relativism. In the second part I analyse conceptual relativism and I consequently propose two different readings of conceptual scheme: (i) conceptual scheme as a monolithic, timeless, and determinate systems of meanings, and (ii) conceptual scheme as a system of relatively stable meanings, that is based on agreement and is open to change over time. In the third part of the paper, I show that of those two readings only the second reading of conceptual scheme fits into the practice of conceptual engineering.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">317</style></custom3></record></records></xml>