<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blecha, Ivan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technika, stavění a bydlení u Martina Heideggera a José Ortegy y Gasseta</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Technology, Building and Dwelling in Martin Heidegger and José Ortega y Gasset</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Architecture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Building</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Existence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heidegger</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Metaphysics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ortega y Gasset</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2017/5/333-346.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">333-346</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Czech</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The article offers a comparison of two entirely contrapositive conceptions of technology: those of Martin Heidegger and José Ortega y Gasset. While Heidegger conceives of technology as one of the effects of metaphysical, i.e. failing thinking of being and world, Ortega y Gasset sees the technology as a means which enables the person to set himself/herself free from his/her animal nature and create a space appropriate for actual human needs. Resulting from these opposite stands are the opposite views on the relationship between &quot;dwelling&quot;and &quot;building&quot;. According to Heidegger, we first have to master the art of dwelling; only then we can start building. According to Ortega y Gasset, we first need the technological building dispositions; the need to dwell appears afterwards. However, it is the concept of architecture which shows the limits in both thinkers. A more balanced attitude is represented by Karsten Harries in his book &lt;em&gt;The Ethical Function of Architecture&lt;/em&gt;. Namely, it takes into account the free space as a place for encounters with other people. Thus the conception of dwelling, building and technology in general takes on a social dimension, which is apparently missing in Heidegger.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">333346</style></custom3></record></records></xml>