<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miloš Taliga</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Je Popperova falzifikovateľnosť kritériom demarkácie?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Popper’s Falsifiability the Demarcation Criterion?</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Demarcation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empirical content</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Popper’s falsifiability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Three dogmas of empiricism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2016/8/644-655.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">71</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">644-655</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The paper highlights Popper’s falsifiability as the demarcation criterion neither of science nor of empirical science, but of empirical content. The difference is of utmost importance for several reasons. First, it shows that the most widespread criticisms of Popper’s criterion are misguided. Second, it sheds new light on the relations between being &lt;em&gt;empirical&lt;/em&gt; and being &lt;em&gt;scientific&lt;/em&gt;. Third, it explains what still remains typical of empiricism after it has been purged from the three dogmas as described by Quine and Davidson. The paper elaborates on all the three points.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papers</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">644655</style></custom3></record></records></xml>