@article {liptak_m2011:2419,
	title = {Ran{\'y} Merleau-Ponty v diskusii s naturalizmom a psychol{\'o}giou},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {66},
	number = {9},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {935-943},
	type = {V{\'y}ro{\v c}ia},
	abstract = {The aim of the paper is an examination of the critical passages in Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s La structure du comportement to show the fruitfulness of Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s critical examination of scientific interpretations of behavior and of several case-studies. Further, attention is paid to criticism of Gestaltpsychology and transcendentalism. In the end the author tries to show, how useful Merleau-Ponty{\textquoteright}s {\textquotedblleft}inductive{\textquotedblright} approach and his way of argumentation used in the book could be for reading of his later works, as well as for phenomenological enquiries in general.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2011/9/935-943.pdf},
	author = {Michal Lipt{\'a}k}
}
