@article {14046,
	title = {Puppeteers and Ventriloquists: The Pippin-{\v Z}i{\v z}ek-Johnston Debate and What It Means to Be a Hegelian Today},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {80},
	number = {1},
	year = {2025},
	pages = {106 - 120},
	type = {State: Philosophy, Politics and Religion: Continuities and Ruptures with Hegelianism},
	abstract = {This paper investigates the polemics between Hegel scholar Robert Pippin and representatives of the {\textquotedblleft}Ljubljana School,{\textquotedblright} Slavoj {\v Z}i{\v z}ek and Adrian Johnston. Our issue is not to reduce the matter to a political quarrel or decide on the {\textquotedblleft}accuracy{\textquotedblright} of their Hegel interpretation, as existing literature has done. Rather, we focus on the debate{\textquoteright}s developments through the lens of {\v Z}i{\v z}ek{\textquoteright}s initial signal that what all participants share is an interest in the question {\textquotedblleft}What does it mean to be a Hegelian today?{\textquotedblright} By analyzing key interactions, we present the argumentative structure of their agreements and differences, most notably on topic of a {\textquotedblleft}need{\textquotedblright} (or not) for a {\textquotedblleft}mutual redemption{\textquotedblright} with psychoanalysis. Doing so, we aim to lay the groundwork for a rudimentary positioning of Ljubljana in the landscape of Hegel scholarship (at least) as these authors perceive it.
},
	author = {Keymeulen, Kobe}
}
