@article {13267,
	title = {Towards a Universal Account of Asymmetry in Non-causal Explanations},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {76},
	number = {6},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {407 {\textendash} 422},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In this paper, I provide a conceptual analysis of the issue of asymmetry in noncausal explanations. I aim to fulfill three subtasks: 1) To define a conceptual space for problem solving (Cf. Reutlinger and Saatsi 2018; Lange 2017); 2) To reflect ongoing debates (Cf. Jansson and Saatsi 2019; Lange 2019; Khalifa et al. 2018); 3) To reflect a model of topological explanation (Cf. Kosti{\'c} 2020). I focus only on non-causal explanations in the context of scientific research. I formulate several counter-arguments against distinctively mathematical explanations. I reflect the ongoing debate on the question of the universal applicability of a counterfactual solution to the problem of asymmetry for both causal and non-causal explanations (Cf. Woodward 2018). I reveal that none of the approaches discussed is without problems and that the proposed solutions to them are unsatisfactory. I consider the model of topological explanation in Kosti{\'c}{\textquoteright}s view to be the most cogent solution to the discussed problem. His model successfully incorporates a counterfactual approach and also offers a solution to the problem of explanation asymmetry in non-causal explanations from a pragmatic point of view.},
	keywords = {Asymmetry, Counterfactual, Explanation, Non-causal, Topological},
	url = {https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/070111252021.76.6.2.pdf},
	author = {Z{\'a}me{\v c}n{\'\i}k, Luk{\'a}{\v s}}
}
