@article {12261,
	title = {S{\'u}{\v c}asn{\'e} umenie na ceste k post-post? Ako Andr{\'e} Stanguennec sp{\'a}ja umenie so skromn{\'y}m, trivi{\'a}lnym a negrandi{\'o}znym},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {71},
	number = {7},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {595-607},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Andr{\'e} Stanguennec sees something new arising in art: after modernity and postmodernity we witness a period called by him a post-post. The latter is a negation of the previous two, included at the same time into a new synthesis, in which they are not opposites any more. The article offers a reconstruction of several aspects of this synthesis. The new form of art is identified first of all in documentary video-art or in the micropoietics of everyday life. Video-art is attractive due to its engagement and the critique of social defects, especially on legal and political levels. The small, non-grandiose poietics is related to more personal morals. It represents the ethical-metaphysical aspect of the new art.
},
	keywords = {Document, Micropoietics, Social critique, Video-art},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2016/7/595-607.pdf},
	author = {Karul, R{\'o}bert}
}
