@article {11581,
	title = {Senova te{\'o}ria spravodlivosti},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {68},
	number = {4},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {265-275},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Today the discussions about justice develop along two lines going back to Enlight- enment. The first one is contractarian while the second one is based on a comparative approach to justice, endorsing the establishment of a society with more justice achieved through getting away with the concrete injustices. The article sheds light on Sen{\textquoteright}s argumentation as offered in his <i>Idea of justice</i>. The author suggests that regard- less of A. Sen{\textquoteright}s innovative approach to justice his theory requires further articula- tion of questions such as: What is the relevant standard by which to measure the ex- tent of justice: capabilities, or functioning{\textquoteright}s? Which capabilities are to be included when evaluating justice? Which distributive rule is to be applied here? What role does the individual responsibility play in evaluating justice?},
	keywords = {Capabilities, Human rights, Justice, Morals, Obligations},
	author = {Palovi{\v c}ov{\'a}, Zuzana}
}
